{"id":4271,"date":"2012-05-16T09:06:54","date_gmt":"2012-05-16T06:06:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.kv.ee\/blog\/?p=4271"},"modified":"2023-05-06T12:06:34","modified_gmt":"2023-05-06T09:06:34","slug":"enamus-maakondades-on-korterite-pakkumishinnad-langenud","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.kinnisvaraweb.ee\/blog\/enamus-maakondades-on-korterite-pakkumishinnad-langenud\/","title":{"rendered":"Enamus maakondades on korterite pakkumishinnad langenud"},"content":{"rendered":"

Eesti elamispindade pakkumishindade d\u00fcnaamikat kajastav KV.EE indeks<\/a> on samal tasemel, kus see oli ka aasta tagasi. Keskmine pakkumiseloleva elamispinna ruutmeeter maksab t\u00e4na 805 \u20ac\/m\u00b2. Elamispindade pakkumiste arv on langenud aastataguselt 20\u00a0855 pakkumiselt t\u00e4naseks 20\u00a0202 pakkumiseni.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Elamispindadest valdava osa moodustavate korterite pakkumishinnad on Eestis tervikuna aastatagusega v\u00f5rreldes 1% v\u00f5rra t\u00f5usnud. Maakondade l\u00f5ikes aga n\u00e4eme, et t\u00f5usu taga on Harju, Tartu ja J\u00e4rva maakonna pakkumiste hinnat\u00f5us. K\u00f5ikides \u00fclej\u00e4\u00e4nud maakondades on korterite pakkumishinnad langenud 1 kuni 11%.<\/p>\n

Paralleelselt tehinguhindadele pilku heites n\u00e4eme, et sealsed hinnamuutused on suuremad. Eestis tervikuna on korteritehingute keskmine hind aastaga 4% t\u00f5usnud. Hinnalangus on olnud k\u00f5igest kuues maakonnas.<\/p>\n

Suurematest korterituru piirkondadest on korterite tehinguhinnad t\u00f5usnud Harjumaal (3%) ja langenud Tartumaal (-2%) ning P\u00e4rnumaakl (-4%).<\/p>\n

Tehinguhindade ja pakkumishindade senine k\u00e4itumine n\u00e4itab, et tehinguhinnad l\u00e4henevad pakkumishindadele. Teisis\u00f5nu j\u00e4\u00e4b portaalis KV.EE v\u00e4hemaks oluliselt \u00fclehinnatud pakkumisi, sest m\u00fc\u00fcjad n\u00e4evad, et m\u00f5istliku ajaga tehinguni j\u00f5udmiseks tuleb pakkumine ka m\u00f5istliku hinnaga v\u00e4lja pakkuda.<\/p>\n

Vaata l\u00e4hemalt, mis toimub kinnisvaraturul portaalist KV.EE<\/a>. <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\nKorterite m\u00fc\u00fcgipakkumiste hind ja selle muutus<\/strong><\/td>\nKorterite tehinguhind ja selle muutus<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Maakond<\/strong><\/td>\n04\/2011<\/strong><\/td>\n04\/2012<\/strong><\/td>\nMuutus, %<\/strong><\/td>\n04\/2011<\/strong><\/td>\n04\/2012<\/strong><\/td>\nMuutus, %<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Eesti<\/strong><\/td>\n989<\/td>\n1 001<\/td>\n1%<\/strong><\/td>\n718<\/td>\n747<\/td>\n4%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Harjumaa<\/strong><\/td>\n1 173<\/td>\n1 201<\/td>\n2%<\/strong><\/td>\n980<\/td>\n1 012<\/td>\n3%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Hiiumaa<\/strong><\/td>\n536<\/td>\n520<\/td>\n-3%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/td>\n<\/td>\nNA<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Ida-Virumaa<\/strong><\/td>\n308<\/td>\n300<\/td>\n-3%<\/strong><\/td>\n220<\/td>\n237<\/td>\n8%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
J\u00f5gevamaa<\/strong><\/td>\n288<\/td>\n263<\/td>\n-9%<\/strong><\/td>\n160<\/td>\n196<\/td>\n22%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
J\u00e4rvamaa<\/strong><\/td>\n322<\/td>\n326<\/td>\n1%<\/strong><\/td>\n123<\/td>\n193<\/td>\n56%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
L\u00e4\u00e4nemaa<\/strong><\/td>\n679<\/td>\n655<\/td>\n-4%<\/strong><\/td>\n355<\/td>\n359<\/td>\n1%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
L\u00e4\u00e4ne-Virumaa<\/strong><\/td>\n382<\/td>\n370<\/td>\n-3%<\/strong><\/td>\n184<\/td>\n168<\/td>\n-9%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
P\u00f5lvamaa<\/strong><\/td>\n394<\/td>\n387<\/td>\n-2%<\/strong><\/td>\n113<\/td>\n211<\/td>\n86%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
P\u00e4rnumaa<\/strong><\/td>\n939<\/td>\n897<\/td>\n-4%<\/strong><\/td>\n566<\/td>\n541<\/td>\n-4%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Raplamaa<\/strong><\/td>\n430<\/td>\n406<\/td>\n-6%<\/strong><\/td>\n275<\/td>\n282<\/td>\n3%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Saaremaa<\/strong><\/td>\n785<\/td>\n784<\/td>\n0%<\/strong><\/td>\n588<\/td>\n555<\/td>\n-6%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Tartumaa<\/strong><\/td>\n937<\/td>\n984<\/td>\n5%<\/strong><\/td>\n792<\/td>\n775<\/td>\n-2%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Valgamaa<\/strong><\/td>\n322<\/td>\n287<\/td>\n-11%<\/strong><\/td>\n114<\/td>\n387<\/td>\n241%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Viljandimaa<\/strong><\/td>\n545<\/td>\n540<\/td>\n-1%<\/strong><\/td>\n290<\/td>\n246<\/td>\n-15%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
V\u00f5rumaa<\/strong><\/td>\n488<\/td>\n459<\/td>\n-6%<\/strong><\/td>\n275<\/td>\n267<\/td>\n-3%<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\"KV.EE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Eesti elamispindade pakkumishindade d\u00fcnaamikat kajastav KV.EE indeks on samal tasemel, kus see oli ka aasta tagasi. Keskmine pakkumiseloleva elamispinna ruutmeeter<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":4272,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[226,266,377,49,379,378,364,9,25,57,11,19,36,380,23,249,312,32,234,179,74,336],"class_list":["post-4271","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-est","tag-eesti","tag-harjumaa","tag-hiiumaa","tag-ida-virumaa","tag-jarvamaa","tag-jogevamaa","tag-korter","tag-kv-ee-indeks","tag-laane-virumaa","tag-laanemaa","tag-pakkumishind","tag-pakkumiste-arv","tag-parnumaa","tag-polvamaa","tag-raplamaa","tag-ruutmeeter","tag-saaremaa","tag-tartumaa","tag-tehing","tag-valgamaa","tag-viljandimaa","tag-vorumaa"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t